X2 4400+ @ 2.8 - 893.82

[ewitte]

CPU - Integer Math 413.68
CPU - Floating Point Math 856.53
CPU - MMX 765.07
CPU - SSE/3DNow! 260.89
CPU - Compression 4906.46
CPU - Encryption 24.28
CPU - Image Rotation 348.00
CPU - String Sorting 2963.38
Graphics 2D - Lines 253.60
Graphics 2D - Rectangles 565.46
Graphics 2D - Shapes 63.51
Graphics 2D - Fonts and Text 451.70
Graphics 2D - GUI 872.97
Graphics 3D - Simple 4595.67
Graphics 3D - Medium 3356.78
Graphics 3D - Complex 1029.61
Memory - Allocate Small Block 2505.86
Memory - Read Cached 969.89
Memory - Read Uncached 944.14
Memory - Write 992.76
Disk - Sequential Read 54.04
Disk - Sequential Write 41.84
Disk - Random Seek + RW 3.43
CD - Read 2.78
CPU Mark 1123.27
2D Graphics Mark 509.58
Memory Mark 527.73
Disk Mark 262.18
CD Mark 138.76
3D Graphics Mark 2994.02
PassMark Rating 893.82

[ewitte]

Better 916.6

http://s120570057.onlinehome.us/images/x2/11.jpg

[RandySavage]

Handily smokes my Athlon 64 3800+ score of 493.8. I seem to have a couple sub-systems that could use some optimization.

Have you been able to compare the multi-tasking capability of that dual core to a P4 with hyper-threading? Any comments?

[David (PassMark)]

If you are running multiple tasks on your PC, dual core is better than hyperthreading.

With hyperthreading there is still a lot of silicon shared between the two virtual CPUs. Meaning that a lot of the time you aren't getting parallel execution of different threads.

----
David